Donald Trump and Bitcoin: His National Security Plan Forgets Cryptocurrencies

A silence that speaks volumes. We know that. The era of Donald Trump 2.0 resonated like an anthem for crypto bros. Barely elected, the president continues to wrap himself in the Bitcoin flag. He made a series of shocking statements and decisions in favor of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. He wanted America to become a beacon of decentralized finance, an anti-Chinese bastion of mining The “Pro-Crypto” Holy Grail.

But watch out for the smoke screens! December 5, 2025, when the White House released the highly anticipated National Security Strategy (SSN), found here, the road map that defines the administration’s “vital national interests” for years to come is stunning. In this solemn document, which aims to “ensure that America remains the greatest and most prosperous nation,” we search in vain for an echo of promises. Not a single mention of the words “bitcoin”, “crypto”, “cryptocurrency” or “blockchain”. We are taking inventory.

Artificial Intelligence: The Real Battle for the US?

But the document is clear on the areas that will make America great and powerful tomorrow. Forget the holy trinity of BTC, ETH and SOL. THE “vital national interests” revolves around another technological pantheon. One who does not suffer no dispute about its direct connection to security and military rule.

A chapter on what the United States wants “in the world and in the world” (Chapter II, Section 2) lays the first stone:

“We want to ensure that American technology and American standards, especially in the areas of artificial intelligence, biotechnology and quantum computing, move the world forward.”

Source: National Security Strategy, November 2025, page 5

L’AI aiquantum computing they are the real headliners. This is where long-term dominance lies. In addition, the Trump administration insists that American power depends on investment in “emerging technology and basic science” guarantee “Competitiveness and Military Dominance” future.

It’s also a question “protect (their) intellectual property from third party theft” and invest heavily in areas that will “determine the future of military power, such as:

• AI,
• quantum computing,
• autonomous systems.

Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies: The Silence of Promises

Absence of cryptocurrency in this text that is supposed to be “travel map” the future is all the more troubling that the Trump administration has often done show for the sector.

Recall that just a few months before, the president insisted that he did not want to “that China is number one in the cryptocurrency world”.

He has also made it clear that he wants to repatriate all Bitcoin mining to the United States, making the relocation of energy and industry a top priority.

Without forgetting, above all, the announcement A brilliant law who oversees the stablecoinsthe creation of a specialized special intervention force or even the establishment of a national bitcoin reserve.

So does the US president have the memory of a goldfish?

The comparison to CIA Deputy Director Michael Ellis makes sense here. In a podcast last May, he said cryptocurrencies were “another area of ​​technological competition where we have to make sure the United States is well positioned against China and other adversaries.” If even the CIA is sounding the alarm about cryptocurrency competition, why is the top strategic document going radio silent?

Digital finance: the blurring of cryptocurrencies?

But let’s not be mean. Perhaps there is a moment when we could, by forcing an interpretation, see the hidden shadow of cryptocurrencies. In the section “ Economic dominance ».

In fact, this is what the administration wants “To maintain and develop the dominance of the US financial sector” by using “Country leadership in digital finance and innovation” guarantee the liquidity and safety of the markets.

This sentence is true semantic spanish hostel. It can refer to classic Wall Street innovations, bank modernization or, of course, cryptocurrencies. But the artistic blurring here is intentional. State the status “vital to national security” bitcoin may have been a step too far, the legitimacy the establishment doesn’t want to give cryptoassets. Of course, the condition remains.

Crypto in the USA: America First

Let us understand that this text is motivated by a single compass: “America First”. From this perspective, artificial intelligence and quantum are not vague promises, but tools for clear military and industrial dominance. Cryptocurrencies seem to be relegated to the role of an economic tool or even an electoral argument without the nobility (or danger) of a major security issue.

Therein lies the spicy irony of the story. The Trump administration may ignore the word “blockchain” in its national security playbook; That doesn’t stop the clan and the president himself from publicly touting their ties to the sector. While the state is silent on Bitcoin, the brand Trump embraced the ecosystem.

So it is permissible to ask whether bitcoin has simply moved from the status of a campaign argument to it (almost) simple money lines. Continuation.